Pro Choice vs. ProLife


Can’t I be both?

You knew this post was coming. I even debated as to whether or not it was useful to have this post but then I realized this is the issue. This is the core and the heart of the War On Choice. The symbols that we are attempting to reshape starts with pro choice and pro-life rhetoric. An individual that subscribes to these symbols literally means that one cannot be pro-life and still endorse a woman’s right to choose. What is the alternative?

This article chooses to use the word anti-choice instead of pro life. This is an interesting choice of rhetoric. Not equating the people that oppose abortion as being for life but anti-choice. Anti agency, and anti a voice or a right a woman would have over her own body. I think this is a unique way to look at the different rhetorical implications of those word choices.  If someone asks me what are you pro life or pro choice, my response is always both. .. those are two values I hold very dearly. However, I am going to defend a woman’s right over her own body every day of the week.

Yet that may not be the case for everyone. I do not think that being pro-choice means you are pro-abortion. What I find most astounding is the ability of other individuals to dictate what should and should not be allowed for another person. I do not view myself as someone that sends a person a greeting card, “Congratulations you had an abortion”. But I would say congratulations you were allowed to exercise your agency as a person.

What strikes me as the most confusing people that are “pro-life” are most often for the death penalty as well, along with the War in Iraq and many other right-wing policies. It does not seem very much pro-life to advocate the United States invading another country, or advocating that we strip away people’s humanities at Guantanamo Bay. I do not think they are “pro” anything but more so ANTI-Choice, and Anti-Agency.

Mission: How often do we say pro-choice v. pro life? Is it merely built into our daily discourse? Do we want to change it? What is another word that could be used? Do you believe it matters?

3 Comments to “Pro Choice vs. ProLife”

  1. I am glad someone is finally clarifying this debate. Very few people are pro-abortion but almost everyone should be pro agency.

  2. Very good point! I think that assigning the terms pro-life and pro-choice isn’t accurate, because both concepts aren’t just related to aboration but about all life in general. I think bringing up the death penalty and the war overseas should also be attached to the terms pro-life and choice. People shouldn’t just generalize those terms to aboration when they should include other concepts as well.

    P.S. LOVE the comic!

  3. I think that any establishment of a binary is the same. Call it whatever you want, “Anti-Choice” “pro-life” “anti-abortion” but the arguments being made by pro-choice individuals are all the same. I’m pro-choice in that I think women make the choice with their “agency” when they engage in actions for which they know the potential consequences. I’m pro-choice in that science has made leaps and bounds with contraceptives and day/week after pills. I’m pro-choice in that every fetus that has developed should have their own agency and their own “choice” as to whether or not society’s conditions are worth living in. I’m also pro-adoption reform that would get children into the arms of individuals that may not themselves be able to conceive (including same sex couples). So I’m just like those who support abortions, however I support the choice and opportunity of all persons – we probably have aborted the next Ghandi and Einstein, but we’ll never know. And I’ll be the conservative to defend my “anti-abortion” – or whatever you want to call it – stance joxtaposed with my belief also in the death penalty. This is because, I too, am “pro-choice” in this instance. Individuals have the ability to choose their actions, knowing the potential consequences. My question is, do “pro-choice” abortion supporters also support suicide? How about speeding? And what about pollution? These are all things that rely on independent agency, and if I don’t have the agency to speed down 21st street, or throw my litter outside, then what choices do I have?!

    As a side note – I felt this blog was in need of some conservative input, if for no other reason then to ignite discussion. The author knows how much I deeply adore her 🙂 (and maybe one day she’ll convince me to be liberal 😉 )

Leave a comment